2013年7月3日星期三

再玩Room Analyzer Part 2 In-Phase還是Out of Phase好?

昨晚試過用下面條curve去睇戲真係無令到低頻失蹤唔見晒,即全無效果

Sub-woofer + Front (Sub-woofer volume: 10 o'clock Polarity: positive Phase: 0 degree elf: -8dB Front crossover: 80hz Sub-woofer crossover: 80hz)


之後要將sub-woofer的volume校返到12點位,才有返正常的低頻效果

Sub-woofer + Front (Sub-woofer volume: 12 o'clock Polarity: positive Phase: 0 degree elf: -8dB Front crossover: 80hz Sub-woofer crossover: 80hz)



Full Range


RTA


睇到就算將sub-woofer volume加大都只係會令到16hz至5Xhz音量增加,6Xhz打後並没提升。但如果phase不改變但將Polarity由positive換成negative的話,60hz會boost得好厲害。

Sub-woofer + Front (Sub-woofer volume: 10 o'clock Polarity: negative Phase: 0 degree elf: -8dB Front crossover: 80hz Sub-woofer crossover: 80hz)

基於以上情況,相信如果將polarity set做positive是out of phase,但假設唔能夠以EQ去削平63hz一段,各位會選用out of phase而得到較平嘅curve還是會用要一個在63hz有高peak嘅in phase setting?

沒有留言:

發佈留言

都係要加返隻二手Entreq Silver Tellus地盒

自己套系統一路都無乜落任何補品,只有一隻Lightspeed HT1 MKII,啲電源線都只係黑雞,訊號線都只係Gotham 11301,因為希望留力升級硬件。唯獨有一個 配件一定要加,就係地盒,而且係越大越好,當年喺Kenneth兄幫手下造咗一隻100磅重嘅地盒,效果真係好驚人...